BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2003 Manipulation of the Vertebrate Host's Testosterone Does Not Affect Gametocyte Sex Ratio of a Malaria Parasite
Sarah M. Osgood, Rebecca J. Eisen, Andrew R. Wargo, JosJ. Schall
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Gametocyte sex ratio of the malaria parasite Plasmodium mexicanum is variable in its host, the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), both among infections and within infections over time. We sought to determine the effect of host physiological quality on the gametocyte sex ratio in experimentally induced infections of P. mexicanum. Adult male lizards were assigned to 4 treatment groups: castrated, castrated testosterone implant, sham implant, and unmanipulated control. No significant difference in gametocyte sex ratio was found among the 4 treatment groups. Two other analyses were performed. A surgery stress analysis compared infection sex ratio of castrated, castrated testosterone implant, and sham implant groups with the unmanipulated control group. A testosterone alteration analysis compared infection sex ratio of the castrated and castrated testosterone implant groups with the sham implant and unmanipulated control groups. Again, no significant difference was observed for these 2 comparisons. Thus, physiological changes expected for experimentally induced variation in host testosterone and the stress of surgery were not associated with any change in the gametocyte sex ratio. Also, the experiment suggests testosterone is not a cue for shaping the sex ratio of gametocytes in P. mexicanum. These results are related to the evolutionary theory of sex ratios as applied to malaria parasites.

Sarah M. Osgood, Rebecca J. Eisen, Andrew R. Wargo, and JosJ. Schall "Manipulation of the Vertebrate Host's Testosterone Does Not Affect Gametocyte Sex Ratio of a Malaria Parasite," Journal of Parasitology 89(1), 190-192, (1 February 2003). https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0190:MOTVHT]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 February 2003
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top